Wednesday, July 30, 2025

So much for K2-18

Anyone who still cares about K2-18 has, like its planet, no life.

The planet "b" still holds interest as a waterworld without, it seems, steam. They say it is a "cold trap". The abstract spots methane and carbon-dioxide, and no ammonia nor carbon-monoxide. So there may be hydrogen in that atmosphere - they say. Although they don't say they spot that hydrogen in the noise.

The molecules they do see could recombine into the "DMS" reported in earlier studies, at trace amounts - without life. But they don't replicate even that.

Tuesday, July 29, 2025

The lamentations

Liz Boase at TheTorah has reread the Lamentations - as a plural. Traditionally, Jews and Christians have ascribed it to Jeremiah, on account the Bible itself ascribes lamentations to this man. Boase accepts that the first chapter aligns with Jeremiah's theology.

They don't always agree with Jeremiah's use of the cant. Jeremiah 1 and 2 each evoke "daughter-Zion", for pity's sake. Jeremiah might refer to "daughter-Egypt" (50-51 / LXX 27-28) but, to clarify Boase, notes "Bat-Zion" only in v. 6:2 which is contested in Greek (where her "pride" is taken away). "Bat-" is a trope; also mooted in Isaiah 37, in context an antiAssyrian oracle but - I don't find where this is controverted - extant in Jeremiah's time for an antiBabylonian purpose. As we all know, Nabu-kadri-usur II falsified that purpose and, indeed, Zion herself.

The second Isaiah in our chapter 54 will sketch Bat-Zion returning home in glory. It is overall an antiLamentation, if not antiJeremiah. Cyrus II of Anshan has fulfilled Isaiah's promise, one might argue, if belated; I suspect, anyway, that's what Isaiah's editors argued.

I accept that Lamentations 1 is, actually, Jeremiah's (or Baruch's). It fills in the Bat-Zion which the prophet inherited but didn't himself use - in the oracles. Recall that our chapter isn't an oracle. It is a theological reflection.

Skeptics are on firmer ground with the other works in this collection. Lamentations 2 confronts God as an angry, pitiless ... enemy not just of Zion but of all Judaea. Even Jeremiah wouldn't go that far. I am amazed more "counter-Jewish" posters haven't picked up on it. (I am not that poster, for those new here.) Lamentations 4 meanwhile is sympathetic to king-in-exile Zedeqiah; the legal husband of Bat-Zion, some might say. Jeremiah famously hated the man. Lamentations 3 curses Babylon which, also, Jeremiah wouldn't do; by whose authority may we curse the scourge which G-d Himself is wielding?

Friday, July 25, 2025

Jeffery Epstein - boy that was fun

I went through this my blog and found a few mentions of that weirdo with his private island and connexions with the Rich, Famous, and Political. Not many mentions, but he was mentioned. This blog was never QAnon but it did (lazily) take the Epstein claims at face value. All the best villains are here: Clinton! Gates! . . . Trump!

Everyone is focused on the Trump angle now. The Left is calling him a "PDF". The Right finds odd that the Left didn't run on this in 2016. They didn't even really do this 2017-2024, beyond the odd pic of the two hobnobbing in New York in the 1990s. Now, finally, some Right figures are peeping out to say what they should have said a decade ago.

As a philosophic look as to why Epstein (and, before him, QAnon) has been so important to the Right: Scott Greer.

For the psychoanalysis on what Jeff E. actually was, in life: Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry makes an attempt. He paints a social-climbing Talented Mister Ripley type, or maybe Saltburn. Jeffie was a walking void. He put all his energy into charming others; and in New York high society, people like to be charmed. And some people honestly loved the man. Take those pictures of Ghislaine and Jeffery canoodling. They look sincere.

People like that don't grow up, though. Hence the yen for the underage. If it's offshore, American consent laws might not apply. So the Epstein couple told themselves.

From that, Gobry rules impossible that foreign intelligence services would ever trust this guy. Especially not Mossad, who might hire Jews, but certainly won't hire Jews as Jews when they're on private islands like freakin' Ernst Stavro Blofeld. Maybe THE JEWS aren't as smart as they think they are. But Mossad/Shin Bet is smarter than most Jews. They have to be.

For Gobry, "the Epstein files" amounts to every New Yorker whom Epstein ever ran up at, which is to say, every Giuliani-/Bloomberg-era New Yorker who ever scrounged the cash to attend a charity event or cocktail party. The New York Times who, you know, actually live there, have copped to it. Hanania figures the whole thing is settled.

Moldbug argues for pursuing this noncase even knowing it is shark-season booshoo. I guess so attention-whores like Vox Day get to keep having stuff to post about. This is cynical. But if the other guys are going to be cynical too, why not set up a soundproof kennel for everyone to bark at each other - whilst Trump does real work.

Tuesday, July 22, 2025

Nippur-12501

Nippur-12501 is a Sumerian tablet from the 2400s BC with mythological content. It was found and its facsimile published, sort-of... as a pretty image for the cover of some book somewhere. It was not, however, edited much less translated. Until now.

The myth concerns Ishkur, the storm god.

If that name seems obscure, that's because Sumer didn't care about the rains - as Jana Matuszak points out. Their waters came from the highlands - as in Egypt. The big stormgod-lovers were out among the Semites (famously): Baal-Hadad; or the Indo-Hittites, as Tarhunta. The Hurrians had a stormgod too and I assume so did the Elamites. Just everyone else but in Sumer and Egypt.

Nippur's myth of Ishkur didn't spread much. Even in Nippur they didn't much copy this tablet; their main god was Enlil. Which is all making me wonder if this was someone else's myth which got carried over here, maybe because someone found entertainment in it.

Monday, July 21, 2025

Fredric Brown

I may or may not have mentioned on this particular blog that back in the sixth grade, we had Read magazine. This sometimes put out classic short-stories, like "Harrison Bergeron". (The later Reagan years were a high water for antiprogressivism; the 1980s decade explains perhaps everything about Gen-X.) One issue, Read devoted to an author whose name I'd forgotten since. I recall two stories in particular: "Rebound", and "The Weapon".

Last night I found the author: Fredric Brown. His most-famous story is certainly "Arena" which became an iconic Trek episode, even keeping the title. I don't know how many know it was Brown's.

I am ashamed to confess that, after forgetting Brown's name and most of the story's content, I rewrote "The Weapon". My main change was to step back from the Weapon premise; my macguffin was a total-conversion energy source (itself inspired by another forgotten Asimov story, who had it from Einstein). That made my protag more sympathetic than Brown's, but also more naïve. Still, TC like fusion could only be used as a weapon in the meantime - and my punchline was regrettably near-identical to Brown's, which words were just that memorable. I submitted this patchjob as a GCSE English Language project (so, tenth grade). I was not called on the four-year-old plagiary-by-memory - but I suspect it was caught, since I ended up with a B in that GCSE where I was expecting an A (I had an A in Literature). I reckon with more work it could have been less Brownian and more focused on Good Intentions Gone Awry. But what to do with the punchline?

That aside, and from the perspective of adulthood and many decades of intervening adaptations, Brown was something of a hack as a writer. He was most pleased to deliver Shaggy Dog Stories. His stories were very short, as exist to deliver The Punchline. I think his less-effective stories have The Punchline as a coda. Think less Trek, more The Scary Door I mean, Outer Limits. (The Twilight Zone is, at heart, more 1960s-bien-pensant than Brown, the cynic, would prefer.)

Also when Brown steps from fantasy-horror or noir, into science fiction, his science fiction is simply not scientific. I mentioned "Arena" here but the parasitic decorative earrings in "And The Gods Laughed" relies on ridiculous assumptions about our solar system's planets. We can allow for life on Mars, but on Ganymede? Really? At least we now know whence the brainslugs so-common in Futurama and now Stellaris. Probably by way of Puppet Masters more than Trek this time.

To the extent I have a fiction writing style, I often cop to Dunsany, Poe, and Ashton-Smith. But now that I know Brown's name, I can at least add him too.

Saturday, July 19, 2025

The new rules

Collective Shout is a shadow government.

I hadn't heard of them, or if I had I'd filed them with a host of activist Groups who push to Change Society. They are not grifters - they're not, oh, Sweet Baby or - dating myself here - Rainbow/PUSH. They're not, as far as I know, in this game to get their friends positions in Human Resources or in some quasigovernmental quango. They are, so far, what they say they are: they accept donations, they pay staff, the staff puts out communiques which the rest of us take or leave.

They got on my radar for pushing Mastercard and VISA to threaten to yank their services from Steam. Steam is a game platform; and is considered a very independent and reputable platform for what they do. Disclosure: I was just on Steam a week or two ago to purchase the game Faster Than Light (2012). Which has its own philosophical Problematics.

What was Steam doing which got them collectively shouted at? Let's read the Shout's own words: Since our launch in 2010, we have achieved many wins: billboards objectifying women pulled down, sexualised childrens clothing withdrawn from sale, sexually violent games banned, Andrew Tate’s pimping courses removed from Spotify, and an age verification trial underway to help protect kids from exposure to porn. Last year saw a record 34 wins.

The idea of forcing corporations on the scale of Mastercard to debank others, I consider, on principle, as paragovernmental. Mastercard and other banks have been too-easily swayed to ban conservative and/or traditional content over the past five years. Well now they're banning the opposite.

Suppose gamers, a libertarian bunch to put it politely, decide to be less libertarian? Lots of gamers dislike LGBT content, and that content gets sold in Triple Ayayayyy games. What's the difference between that and the CSAM which just got #cancelled?

"Consenting Adults!" - yeah, but the games aren't solely sold to those adults...

Wednesday, July 16, 2025

Roundup in Classical Biblical Hebrew diachronics

Very little has come by in the past week, so I'll just run a link-list tonight. We're on-topic of diachronic biblical-Hebrew linguistics.

Specifically: Classical, as opposed to LBH which everyone seems to agree is its own (Second-Temple) thing. Tania Notarius is working the other end, the poetry, which tracks closer to early offshoot Ugaritic. Aaron Hornkohl thinks he can sus the prose, which he's done in open-access (yay!). But Hornkohl has critics. The Hornkohl critics at least take him seriously which we don't do (say) for Eric Weinstein.

To the degree I am a Semitist, which isn't much, that not-much is even less much in Hebrew. So I'm not here taking sides.