So I kinda/sorta trusted VAERS when deciding on the booster in fall 2021. I rolled those dice having taken Pfizer's original schedule that spring and then catching some yuck in June. Stayed un-boosted.
That RS means it is a reporting system for the V.A. Events. That database accumulated a lot of such reportage. Less from Pfizer than from Moderna I think, but the second jab I took had some statistical problems. And people were freaking out over - all of them, as the same "Clot Shot". Which might skew the results, like all those geezers and morons freaked out over sudden acceleration in the late-1980s Audi.
There could have been some signal-to-noise correction in how various agencies read the VAEs from the RS. The British Medical Journal est. 1840 must report on what happened.
This journal is not some Slay News fly-by-night; they are generally pro-vax, like for shingles.
The journal notes that by mid-2021 the FDA knew there was a noise problem in VAERS. It further uncovers a letter which, in September 2022, then-CDC-director Rochelle Walensky sent: Walensky was worried that it was all getting stupid over at the FDA. The FDA meanwhile was muzzling the people raising the concerns the prior year.
By noise, BMJ means the FDA simply ignored myocarditis, pericarditis, or tinnitus
as not-counting as a real vaccine adverse event. The "-card-" root means cardio - the heart.
The FDA honcho during this time was Peter Marks. He'd been a big force in "Operation Warp Speed" in May 2020. Robert Kennedy demanded Marks' resignation 28 March 2025. You can now find Marks at Eli Lilly in DC.
No comments:
Post a Comment