Saturday, June 4, 2022

No soup for neutron-stars

Two years ago I called shens about whether Quark Soup exists. Last year the Lead Radius Experiment (Pb-R-Ex, pronounced "prex" I guess) cast further doubt. Zaven Arzoumanian's team at NICER, and others, looked at pulsars J0030 then J0740; Arzoumanian promised some results on a third pulsar at that time. [h/t Nyrath's twitter.]

Neutron-star radii can actually be measured, even from this distance. Their magnetic poles - like ours - don't always align with their rotational poles. Such are "pulsars" which send X-Rays our way. Then we know their rotation-period... to the nanosecond. Apparently when the magnetic pole runs on the other side of the pulsar, the gravity of the ex-star bends the radiation just so. Now we got radius, and gravity. Even if the ex-star doesn't have planets or other companions (Kepler, yo!), which some do.

As for which pulsar they want next, formal publication is slow. I had to dig in the arxiv. Turns out: this one's famous. They're looking into J0437−4715, the closest (at about 391.79 light years away) and brightest. (Told you pulsars are measurable... and that publication is slow.) As to why NICER didn't measure it yet, maybe that's because it's in an orbit with a white dwarf perhaps muddying the readings.

LOW MASS 10/24 This might be a quark star.

No comments:

Post a Comment