Richard Carrier argues that "Christian Nationalism" means NSDAP. To be more precise: NSDAP as ex-Catholic Hitler envisioned it post-Beer-Hall is a natural outgrowth of political Lutheranism.
The Catholics have a vision of the state as well: the pan-Christian "Christendom", backed up in dogma with the paraNestorian filioque. Obviously this vision conflicts with Luther's. As a result, Lutherans as of AD 1925 used the Catholic word "Christentum" to mock it.
When you look at Theodore Beale's site with the "voxday" URL, you often read the term "Churchian" and "Churchianity". These are Christian institutions which, in Beale's mind, are unfit for purpose. The Venn containing the "Churchianity" and "Christentum" circles is one circle.
I don't think Beale can (or should bother) argue with Carrier's finding. What he might argue is whether the NSDAP was in fact too tolerant, as to make it a poor vehicle for Christian Nationalism. Until the Long Knives the NSDAP was something of a coalition, from Röhm's brief for sodomía to Himmler's mysticism. Neither are particularly easy to count as Christian.
Beale also can't complain about Carrier's arrogant style and willingness to throw names about like PZ Myers at his worst. I might so complain.
No comments:
Post a Comment