Final Palatial

Minoan Crete was literate but presently prehistoric, despite overlapping enimently historic nations like XVIII Dynasty Kemet (or "Egypt", if you follow Ptah), Ugarit, and the Hatti. Between the mid 1400s and 1370 BC, Knossos was Greek. Hermahai recently floated a theory out of school, that this "Final Palatial" Greek colony got sacked in a rebellion.

Everyone knows that Knossos was burned. That is one reason we have this snapshot of scribal tablets, baked in place. This is what proves that "final" construction of this formerly-Minoan palace was administered via the Linear B medium, although some Linear A had survived too.

Excitable speculative classicists like Mary Renault used to get confused about the various major events around here: Thera's eruption, the Greek takeover, and the fire. Most agree these days that Thera blew up on the early side of the 1500s, although some nasty weather events had preceded this from earlier eruptions far elsewhere. The indigenous leaders of Knossos and of other palaces had well over a century to get their acts together and, like, not become Greeks. Anyway: they got took by Greeks who had their own ideas on how to live in a foreigners' palace.

That rule, it seems, lasted eight decades / fourscore years, which I can compare only to the Latin kingdom in the AD 1200s Constantinople. Hermahai is calling it a misrule. He sketches a totalitarian bandit state: capitalism for us, fascism for the yokels. This, we might even compare to the early Bolshevists; or to the Moghuls. Maybe to the Assads.

Elsewhere the likes of Javid Hashmi would discuss "colonialism" or "settler colonialism". I'm not getting into that; except to call him a bully, who makes up words to demoralise and ultimately dehumanise people he poses as beneath him. What I would like to know, is the general phenomenon. I ask if this Greek elite wanted to stay in Knossos, or if they were just using it to fund adventures back in Greece. The Moghuls believed they were Timurids and, stuck in northern India, aimed to fund their victorious return to Central Asia; ol' Clive certainly didn't want to make Bengal his home. On the other hand, we have the Rhodesians and the criollos of Lima, who absolutely did hope to stay where they were. I get the impression that the Greeks' extensive work on the Knossos palace suggests they enjoyed the Knossos life.

As material-culture goes, most place the fire at Late Minoan IIIA2. A minority holds out for LM IIIB, although that is more postPalatial, which term means what it looks like it means. The toponyms of Linear B (we can't read much A) point to Knossos administering, or exploiting, the whole west and centre of Crete. I'd the impression the east was a fair concern once upon a time.

And the Final Palace had some fear that a disaster was coming. Emilia Oddo thinks they were hoarding bronze. Even in those days they might be able to predict a volcano, but not an earthquake or a random blaze. An invasion or a peasant revolt however...

I continue my suspicion that these Greeks had come from the west of the island. The east, perhaps, held forth against the invaders. If so, the east would have provided a haven for the old Knossians. Sometimes they come back.

Although: pace Hermahai, whoever did burn down the palace, didn't erect a Fourth Palatial. Qui bono, was a LM IIIB palace at Chania almost-certainly named "Kudonia" at the time. I'm pondering less a revanchist revolt, and more a protoDorian invasion. I should like to see some tree ring analysis.

BACKDATE 4/17